Thread:UnofficiallyRed/@comment-28070587-20180204170229/@comment-28070587-20180221144000

Magicasquirrel wrote: GorgonzolaSW wrote: no, you just don't have an explanation

I hate this type of people, firstly they start a pointless argument and then say "I don't want to waste my time" and end it without solving it.

also, your only argument in the conversation is "some weird website which is supported by some youtuber thinks the pekka is and ebarbs are not, so shut up". The other ones are pointless, and rather invented while you wait ("Who in teh world plays freeze", "lvl 4 guards counter lvl 13 ebarbs", "you'll tell me about unstoppable valkyrie+ebarbs/fire spirits combo"). You are stubborn. I am not gonna explain why I see the PEKKA as a win condition. And even if it isn't a win condition, there is one thing that I will never accept, and that thing is that Elite barbarians are a win conditiion.

ELITE

BARBARIANS

ARE

NOT

A

WIN

CONDITION

.

If you didn't realise it, I am triggered right now. So, if that was what you were aiming for - congratulations.

So, you can think ANYTHING you want about me. I don't care. I was trying to tell you that PEKKA is a win conditiion and Elite barbarians are not. And even If PEKKA is not a win condition, neither are elite barbarians. I can list you every interaction, every reason I know why elite barbarians are not a win condition, but you will keep it going, until this eventually turns into a war. And I am not a person who likes wars. so, you can say all you want, you can think all you want about me.

from now on, I am not saying a single thing on this post, or any other post that will have a phrase like "Ebarbs are a win condition".

Well, I raged. Sorry about that. I also don't like arguments/wars and I maybe sounded stubborn here. I apologize.

And well, I think we shouldn't talk about "are/is a win condition?" because it causes unnecessary conflicts. I never used ebarbs as a win condition anyway.